Schematic of the photo-activation of the
Sylil glyoxilate "DKSi" photo-initiator
under Blue Light Excitation
(c) Aurélien Pasturel 2021
From photo-polymerization down to opto-genetics, triggering reactions with light has become an important part of today's research and to work perfectly, the light source and the photo-reagents have to go hand in hand:
Low energy consumption
Low cost
Low maintenance / High life time
Low profile / are highly compact
Fast response time
Control over pulse and intensity
LED are much better than Hg lamps for all those reasons.
(c) Wikipedia
In this graph you have the emission spectra of several LEDs sold by ThorLab's.
Notice how the LED that are emitting in UV (<375 nm) are much less powerfull than the ones emitting in blue (>375nm).
Simply put, UV led's are more difficult to produce and in turn are less powerfull while also being more expensive.
(c) Polymer Chemistry https://doi.org/10.1039/C5PY00258C
This Jablonski Perrin diagram shows the typical behaviour of benzophenone upon UV (375nm) irradiation. Like many other photo-initiators it works poorly under blue light.
To quote the authors : "At higher wavelengths (λ > 365 nm) most of the classical/commercial PIs exhibit a low absorption due to their initial development for Hg lamps. "
My PhD work was centered around photostructuration of hydrogels for 3D cell culture. Near its end, I was tempted to move away from UV illumination and use a new LED-based illumination system. Unfortunately no photo-initiator seemed to do the trick...
That's when I stumbled upon this publication: Silyl glyoxylates as a New Class of High Performance Photoinitiators: Blue LED Induced Polymerization of Methacrylates in Thin and Thick Films.
Now let me explain what made me think this was different from the other works I had seen.
You may argue that there are in fact many other visible (blue) light photo-initiators in use today or under development and you are right; Camphorquinone is the historical blue light photo-initiator and is commonly used in dental applications. In the litterature, there are extensive reviews listing original, LEd-optimized photo-initiators.
Nonetheless, I think Silyl glyoxylates have distinct features that make them appealing:
Photoinitiators are best when they react swiftly. For example when one want to cure a resin in dental applications , the shorter it takes the less disturbing it is for the patient.
When it comes to curing a resin , Silyl glyoxilates react faster and create more crosslinks than Camphor Quinone.
(c) Macromolecules https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.7b01370
This shows the chemical structure of various LED-optimized photo-initiators including DKSi.
As you can see the glyoxilates have a much simpler structure which oftens translates into : cost efficient synthesis.
(c) Polymer Chemistry: https://doi.org/10.1039/C5PY00258C
Last but not least, it is often important that the photo-initiator preserves the material optical properties mainly transparency. In those pictures you can see how resins polymerized with camphorquine progressively turn yellow after a few months whereas those polymerized with DkSI kept their transparency.
(c) Macromolecules https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.7b01370
Closing: Bridging a wavelength gap
As LED illumination becomes more and more popular it seems natural that new classes of photoinitiators emerge to make use of these technological advances.
If you liked this short introduction you may also have a look at other papers from the same group describing other promising photo-initiators: